Lucy (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
luciazephyr) wrote2007-01-03 08:31 pm
luciazephyr) wrote2007-01-03 08:31 pm
Entry tags:
Joe brings the PWN'age hammer down on Bill O'RLY.
Oh my god...
Joe Scarborough, when did you become so fucking awesome?!?!
Seriously, omg. Bill O'Reilly, barely an hour ago, took on MSNBC and Keith in particular for "hating Bush and loving Saddam". Not kidding here. So, Joe Scarborough is now taking Bill-O to fucking task for it. GO, BABY, GO!
*applaudes*
Though, ya know, if Keith hadn't been in the middle of his own show at the time, he'd have been doing the same. That's obvious. But the fact that Joe stood up and fought back makes me so proud.
Dear Mr. Scarborough,
I did not realize you rocked so hard. You watched the Saddam video and dared to admit that Saddam was the most dignified man in the room? You're right and you're gonna pay for saying that. FOX News will take that out of context, you know they will. But you said it anyway, you stood up for your network and for a man's whose political views are directly opposed to yours.
You are the best Republican ever. I kinda love you.
Hugs and kisses,
Lucy, your average "liberal progressive secular fag"
So, I'm gonna have to stop turning off MSNBC after Keith now, I figure.
-Luce
ETA: Have sent a request to Anderson's show about the hubbub over the President wanting the line-veto thing. What I wrote:
The term "one-line veto" has been flying around all day on the news channels and all the anchors seem to be making a big deal of it. It's a bit annoying because the concept has yet to be fully explained. The President can essentially cut unwanted lines out of a bill and then pass it? Shouldn't he need to run the revised version of the bill pass Congress again? Otherwise, what would stop the President from, say approving a new weapon for the military but cutting out a requirement for special training for the new weapondry? Okay, maybe that's an impossible situation, but hopefully you'll get the point.
If the topic comes up on 360 tonight, I'd greatly appreciate it if Anderson actually, ya know, explained it.
MEBBE I WILL BE ON AC360 NOW?!?!
Joe Scarborough, when did you become so fucking awesome?!?!
Seriously, omg. Bill O'Reilly, barely an hour ago, took on MSNBC and Keith in particular for "hating Bush and loving Saddam". Not kidding here. So, Joe Scarborough is now taking Bill-O to fucking task for it. GO, BABY, GO!
*applaudes*
Though, ya know, if Keith hadn't been in the middle of his own show at the time, he'd have been doing the same. That's obvious. But the fact that Joe stood up and fought back makes me so proud.
Dear Mr. Scarborough,
I did not realize you rocked so hard. You watched the Saddam video and dared to admit that Saddam was the most dignified man in the room? You're right and you're gonna pay for saying that. FOX News will take that out of context, you know they will. But you said it anyway, you stood up for your network and for a man's whose political views are directly opposed to yours.
You are the best Republican ever. I kinda love you.
Hugs and kisses,
Lucy, your average "liberal progressive secular fag"
So, I'm gonna have to stop turning off MSNBC after Keith now, I figure.
-Luce
ETA: Have sent a request to Anderson's show about the hubbub over the President wanting the line-veto thing. What I wrote:
The term "one-line veto" has been flying around all day on the news channels and all the anchors seem to be making a big deal of it. It's a bit annoying because the concept has yet to be fully explained. The President can essentially cut unwanted lines out of a bill and then pass it? Shouldn't he need to run the revised version of the bill pass Congress again? Otherwise, what would stop the President from, say approving a new weapon for the military but cutting out a requirement for special training for the new weapondry? Okay, maybe that's an impossible situation, but hopefully you'll get the point.
If the topic comes up on 360 tonight, I'd greatly appreciate it if Anderson actually, ya know, explained it.
MEBBE I WILL BE ON AC360 NOW?!?!
no subject
Anyway, I would just like to give a hearty thumbs-up for showing it's possible for a liberal to write something positive about Joey Scars. If you continue to watch his show, you'll find that he is definitely a conservative, but Scars is certainly not a lapdog to the administration, or even his own party.
And he does a lot of segments about the cultural/social/political impact of TDS.
no subject
He seems kinda cool. And, god, I know of the crush he has on Stephen Colbert. It's painfully obvious and so cute. Stephen even ended a show: "That's the Colbert Report, the number one place to find clips of me, except Scarborough County." So, heh. And the only reason I haven't been watching Joe is that I see how loud and mean his guests get, then I see guests on Anderson and just think that Andy's got more control over them. *luvs on Andy*