HuffPo will publish ANYTHING. I mean, I like my news to be reality-based too, but it's the web equivalent of some morning show person asking a question by starting, "SOME say -- not me, no one I actually know, but it turned up in my e-mail this morning and I need to stretch this out to 7 minutes -- that you're a terrorist because of your middle name! How do you respond to that?"
It's like Blogging O says. We don't have any illusions that he's some perfect paragon. Call KO out when he's being ridiculous. But check your sources too. Keith was ripped quite rightly when he had Lawrence O'Donnell on that one time the day after he'd written that scathing anti-John E article. (For which I have not yet forgiven him, but I digress.) Rachel Sklar's obvious anti-O bias should be taken into account.
And the NY POST *hates* KO, so why even give them the time of day?!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
luciazephyr) wrote2008-06-12 08:01 pm
no subject
It's like Blogging O says. We don't have any illusions that he's some perfect paragon. Call KO out when he's being ridiculous. But check your sources too. Keith was ripped quite rightly when he had Lawrence O'Donnell on that one time the day after he'd written that scathing anti-John E article. (For which I have not yet forgiven him, but I digress.) Rachel Sklar's obvious anti-O bias should be taken into account.
And the NY POST *hates* KO, so why even give them the time of day?!